Massachusetts Could Ban Home Grows Even Though People Voted For Them

That didnt take long.Immediately after Massachusetts voters passed Question 4 to legalize marijuana, the top office-holder tasked with leading the implementation and regulation of the law, Treasurer Deb Goldberg, was already asking to change it.

She wasnt alone. Within a week of people passing the initiative to tax and regulate cannabis, many other influential Bay State politicians -and at least one hack scribe, Boston Globe pro-business siren Shirley Leung -were advocating to repeal parts of the law that 1,745,945 heads pulled for.

The day after the initiative passed, Goldberg kicked it off by gesturing to extend deadlines. Later in the week, she voiced support for the state legislature to outlaw the 6-12 plant home grow provision and to increase the tax rate. Goldberg said home grows would hurt retail sales, and cut into the states take as well, which is interesting since weeks ago the treasurer was complaining that the initiative was written by the commercial marijuana industry. Now she seemingly supports holding consumers captive to a marketplace that she presumably distrusts. Go figure.

And then theres Senate President Stan Rosenberg, who supported the initiative (when he wasnt complaining that lawmakers could have written it better, that despite the fact that both the Senate and House failed to allow a full chamber vote on any marijuana law in the last 20-plus years). Rosenberg told the Globe, I believe that when voters vote on most ballot questions, they are voting in principle. They are not voting on the fine detail that is contained within the proposal. Thats quite the statement. Many voters would dispute such a characterization. Especially in this case, and especially as far as home grow goes.

I absolutely voted for home grows, says Stephen Mandile, a local veteran. If the ballot question banned home grows, I would have voted [against it].

Communicating with other readers and people in the cannabis community, I heard the same thing.

Home grow is very important, says Isaac Caplan, who also went for the initiative. The only way to know exactly how quality your weed is is to grow it yourself.

A few more for good measure. Matthew Krawitz, a voter from Swampscott, agrees.Just as I can brew beer in my basement, I should be able to grow a reasonable amount of marijuana for personal use.

According to Peter Bernard, director at theMassachusetts Grower Advocacy Council, We will fight to keep home grows. Thats part of what the voters voted for. Regulate? Sure. Completely ban a home grow or arbitrarily change the tax structure? Not so fast. Its like giving something and then immediately taking it away before you can even get the wrapper off.

In a subsequent interview with a television news station, Sen. Rosenberg edited himself, telling a reporter, I dont believe people will be willing to get rid of home grown, but there may be some changes that would have to occur in that.

In a remarkable moment of honesty, even Gov. Charlie Baker, who actively campaigned against the initiative, told the State House News Service, That was one piece [the home grow provision] of that 6,000-word ballot question that I think a lot of people understood straight out of the gate.

As for the enduring prohibitionist forces at the Globe, theyre only getting more relentless. A page-one story in November gave space for police chiefs to cry foul and repeat demonstrably nonsensical talking points about potency and home grow electrical fires, while Leung jabbed, Congratulations Massachusetts, we just passed one of the worst pot bills in the country. Now what?

She has one hell of a selective crystal ball; while Leung foresees a nightmare weedscape on the near horizon, on the subject of her beloved Boston 2024 Olympics, the columnist once claimed well never really know how that sunken charade would have ended for taxpayers.

Leung is pushing the same capitalist crap we are now seeing from innumerable politicians, right down to the municipal level. They have no proof to support the claim that taxes at the rate of 3.75 percent (an excise tax on top of sales ...